Friday, January 24, 2020
From Coexistence to Conflict :: history
From Coexistence to Conflict From Coexistence to Conflict in 19th Century Mount Lebanon Mount Lebanon has been a troubled region throughout much of Lebanese history. Through most of the 19th century, the Maronite and Druze inhabitants of the Mount Lebanon region had successfully coexisted in an intricate inter-sectarian system. True to the words of Leila Fawaz, ââ¬Å"Lebanon was at peace, as it had been for most of its history.â⬠Excessive foreign intervention, however, caused the status in Mount Lebanon to move from coexistence to conflict, which ultimately led to the civil war of 1860. The first step that led to the emergence of inter-sect rule in Lebanon was the gaining of autonomy by local rulers. Fakhr al-Din al Maani was the first prince in the region, and he was awarded that title and responsibility by the Ottomans as a reward for his loyalty to them. Prior to Fakhr al-Din, Lebanon did not have an autonomous ruler; it was fully controlled by the Ottomans. The Maanis, however, were not only supported by the Ottomans, but by the local citizens as well, and this common support for a single ruler helped bring about inter-sectarianism. The Druze-Maronite inter-sectarian system gained its roots during the reign of Fakhr al-Din II, who raised the Maronites to the same civil status as their Druze counterparts. This equal status allowed both sects to live peacefully among each other. Fakhr al-Dinââ¬â¢s reign soon came to an end though in 1635, when the Ottomans, who had control over Lebanon at the time, captured and executed Fakhr al-Din for trying to expand the are a under his control. By upsetting the balance between local and Ottoman rule, Fakhr al-Din brought about the end of his reign as prince. After two insignificant rulers, the princedom fell to the Shihab family, which would rule the Mount Lebanon region from 1697 to 1842. During the long reign of the Shihab family, the Maronites had slowly started to gain power as the Druze began to weaken. The most notable of the Shihabs was Prince Bashir II. During his reign, Prince Bashir II developed a strong relationship with Sheikh Bashir Jumblatt. The Jumblatt family was originally of Sunni Kurdish descent and they later became accepted as part of the Druze community. After the end of the Maani dynasty, the Jumblatts took their place as lords of the Shouf and rapidly rose to power. Consequently, the Jumblatts were able to influence other areas of the region.
Thursday, January 16, 2020
Decriminalization of Marijuana
Darnell Taylor M. Channing English 1B March 5, 2013 Decriminalization of Marijuana As I researched the internet for information about the decriminalization of marijuana, I found so much information concerning this project that it was hard putting together some thoughts. Through my research of the different topics I came to the conclusion that the ones I am writing about seem to be the most important concerning the decriminalization of marijuana. Should a person go to jail for smoking marijuana? A lot of people would say no, a person should not go to jail for smoking it.Marijuana is not a narcotic, such as heroin, or a stimulant like caffeine or tobacco, or a depressant, like alcohol. It would be easy to say marijuana is less of a threat to a personââ¬â¢s health than alcohol or tobacco. Marijuana became illegal on August 2, 1937 with the passage of the Marijuana Tax Act. Discrimination and racism played a big part in this because it was said that Blacks and other minorities were th e majority of marijuana users. Politicians and lack of understanding of the drug is why marijuana is still illegal today.The scientific name for marijuana is cannabis. There are two main strains of marijuana and they are called Indica and Sativa. Cannabis is known in the streets, by many other names such as dank, bud, buddha, maryjane, weed, or reefer, and has been used medically since the beginning of civilization. The oldest known evidence of cannabis use comes from a tomb in the African country of Egypt, where cannabis was found in big bundles beside the tomb. In Canada, a high-level public official said the current marijuana prohibition was not working for the benefit of that country .The number of known marijuana users has grown from 55,000 to 350 million, a fact showing that prohibition of marijuana is not working. The big push for the United States to decriminalize marijuana started in the 1970ââ¬â¢s, when almost half the states either approved it for medical use, decrimin alized it, or completely legalized it. The people for decriminalization argue that legalizing cannabis would free up billions of dollars that we now use to prosecute users, pay for a large portion of law enforcement resources, and pay for large amounts of prison resources.It would reduce the income of street gangs and organized crime that grow, import, process, and sell illegal marijuana. With decriminalization and regulation it would provide large amounts of tax revenue and reduce enforcement costs, with little or no effect on how much is used. Decriminalization would lower the number of non-violent offenders in the prisons. The number of marijuana possession cases would also decline allowing less pressure on the Criminal Justice system. Decriminalization and legalization of marijuana are favored just because it is believed that a personââ¬â¢s rights should be respected.How a person lives his life, as long as heââ¬â¢s not hurting others, should be allowed. Users wouldnââ¬â ¢t have to be scared of getting caughtââ¬â¢ a personââ¬â¢s life would not be ruined for having a small amount of marijuana. A person wouldnââ¬â¢t lose his job because he had a little marijuana. College careers wouldnââ¬â¢t be ruined because of marijuana possession. The opposition also argues that cannabis on the streets today has a higher percentage of THC (the primary intoxicant), than in cannabis of an earlier time and that decriminalization will lead to more usage, more crime, and more abuse of dangerous illicit drugs.The Legal History of Marijuana in the United States: Decriminalization (1970-2000s) Check all the places that have decriminalized non-medical marijuana in the United States. Most of the states are in favor of decriminalization. They have started programs such as Drug Education or Drug Treatment in place of jail time or criminal charges for possession of small amounts of marijuana. This offense is now the lowest priority for law enforcement. In 1972, Pres ident Richard Nixon set up a committee to study marijuana use.The Commission found out that the fairness of cannabis prohibition was unclear, and that the Executive and Legislative branches had a responsibility to obey the Constitution. Even in the absence of a court ruling to do so, they did not put the studyââ¬â¢s recommendations in action. In 1973, Oregon became the first state to decriminalize marijuana. In 1974, a Senate Internal Security Subcommittee, chaired by Senator James O. Eastland on the Marijuana-Hashish Epidemic and its impact on United States security said that evidence collected on marijuana had turned against this drug.By 1978 Alaska, California, Colorado, Mississippi, New York, Nebraska, North Carolina, and Ohio had some form of marijuana decriminalization. Certain cities and countries, especially in California, had adopted laws to further push decriminalized cannabis. When speaking against decriminalization, a 1974 study by the United States government and end orsed by then-President Ronald Reagan is being used. The results claim that in a test using monkeys, loss of brain cells was discovered. Unknown to the public was that this story was totally unfair.The monkeys were made to wear gas masks and marijuana was then pumped into their lungs non-stop for 5 minutes at a time with no fresh oxygen. It was a miracle the monkeys didnââ¬â¢t die and suffered only brain damage in this act of animal cruelty. Another study published in ââ¬ËThe Journal of Clinical Investigationâ⬠shows that cannabis use actually stimulates cell development. It is not possible to overdose on marijuana, unlike most prescription and illegal drugs. Marijuana has yet to be proven addictive or deadly.No deaths have been linked to marijuana use. It has no known lethal dose. Health issues and family responsibilities, not legal issues, are reasons given for stopping or never starting the use of marijuana. Even the thought of it being a ââ¬Å"gatewayâ⬠drug is controversial. Research shows the real ââ¬Å"gatewayâ⬠is the illegal drug market. The ââ¬Å"gatewayâ⬠effect for marijuana could be because exposure to other illegal drugs when buying marijuana ââ¬Å"on the streetsâ⬠increases the opportunity to use other illegal drugs.Several states have taken steps about the marijuana issue by decriminalizing the possession of small amounts of the drug, reducing sanctions for amounts suitable for personal use. For marijuana that means one ounce or less. In recent history, there have been a lot of unsuccessful attempts to decriminalize cannabis. In 1974, Dr. Robert DuPont, the White House Drug Czar, began to publicly support the decriminalization of marijuana. When DuPont left government he changed his mind, seeing marijuana as a health problem and declaring ââ¬Å"decriminalization is a bad ideaâ⬠.Robert DuPont is still an active opponent of the decriminalization of marijuana. A law to legalize marijuana state-wide was put on the California Ballot in 1972. Proposition 19 was rejected by 66 percent of the votes. The Initiative reads as follows: 1. No person in the State of California, 18 years or older shall be punished, or be denied any right or privilege, by reason of such personââ¬â¢s planting, cultivating, harvesting, drying, processing, otherwise transporting, or possessing marijuana. 2.This provision shall in no way be construed to repeal existing legislation, or limit the enactment of future legislation, prohibiting persons under the influence of marijuana from engaging in conduct that endangers others. In Gonzales vs. Raich the courts ruled in a 6-3 decision that the Commerce Clause and the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution allowed the Federal government to ban the use of cannabis (including medical use) because Federal law is ââ¬Å"supremeâ⬠and overrules State law.Further legalization of cannabis came in 2012 as two of three things to vote on were put on the general ballot of November 6th and were successful by wide margins. Washingtonââ¬â¢s Initiative 502 (2011) and Coloradoââ¬â¢s Amendment 64 (2012) passed in the general election, as Oregonââ¬â¢s Ballot Measure 80 (2012) failed. Both of the successful measures restricted cannabis possession to adults aged 21 or over, restricted the total amount allowed and included a ââ¬Å"DUIDâ⬠(Driving under the Influence of Drugs) provision against driving under the influence of marijuana.Both specifically regulated cannabis much like hard liquor has been since the end of prohibition in the United States and avoided any changes to medical marijuana law. Initiative 502 defined marijuana based on its THC content and controlled all growth; processing and sales of marijuana based on its THC content and controlled all growth, processing and sale of marijuana under the Washington State Liquor Control Board, with restrictions against public consumption. The Colorado Measure allowed ââ¬Å"private growsâ⬠in addition to commercial regulation.The failed Oregon law established a new State agency to regulate and tax cannabis but was less specific and allowed possession for all adults, aged 18 or older. Illegal marijuana cost taxpayers $7. 5 billion a year (enforcement, prosecution, incarceration and monitoring). It also makes growing hemp, which can be used to make cloth, paper and rope, against the law. When imported from places like Canada, Russia, and China hemp products are legal. In 1645 hemp was a cash crop in America and Europeans were growing it before that. Almost one million people a year are in trouble with the law, about marijuana. 15 billion a year goes to the ââ¬Å"War on Marijuanaâ⬠, which doesnââ¬â¢t look too successful. Decriminalization will reduce these numbers. There is little proof that decriminalization of marijuana use leads to an increase in marijuana use. Almost one million people a year are in trouble with the law, about marijuana. $15 bil lion a year goes to the ââ¬Å"War on Marijuanaâ⬠, which doesnââ¬â¢t look too successful. Decriminalization would reduce these numbers. In January, 2011, first year Arizona Republican Legislator John Fillmore introduced House Bill 2228.This bill would decriminalize marijuana possession of 2 ounces or less to a petty offense with a penalty no more than a $100 fine, similar to the laws in Colorado and California. On January 1, 1975, Senate Bill 95 made possession of under one ounce of marijuana for non-medical use punishable by a $100 fine; tougher punishments exists for amounts of more than an ounce, possession on school grounds, or violation of marijuana laws for sales or cultivation. If the offender is under the age of 21, his or her Driverââ¬â¢s License may be suspended for up to one year.In Mendocino County, voters in 2000 approved Measure G, which called for the decriminalization of marijuana when used, or cultivated for personal use. Measure G passed with a 58 percen t majority vote, making it the first county in the United States to declare prosecution of small-scale cannabis offenses The ââ¬Å"lowest priorityâ⬠for law enforcement. Measure G does not protect individuals who cultivate, transport, or possess marijuana for sale. Measure G was passed at the local government level making it law only in Mendocino County and does not affect existing state or federal laws.On September 30, 2010 California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed into law, S. B. 1449. A bill that decriminalizes the possession of up to one ounce of marijuana. The bill reduces simple possession from a misdemeanor to an infraction. This would eliminate the need to appear in court and would treat possession of less than 28. 5 grams like a traffic ticket, punishable by a $100 fine. Also in 2010, Proposition 19, titled the ââ¬Å"Regulate, Control, and Tax Act 2010â⬠, qualified for the November California Ballot. It was rejected by 54 percent of the voters.The Initiat ive would have legalized the recreational use of marijuana and its activities in the state of California. It would have let local governments to regulate and tax the cannabis market. In Colorado marijuana has helped the state economically with millions of dollars in revenue generated with the legalization of marijuana for adult use, regulating and taxing it the same way alcohol is regulated. Before November 6, 2012 the cities of Breckenridge and Denver, Colorado had passed Measures to make possession of up to one ounce of marijuana legal, even though possession was still a crime under tate and federal laws. Amendment 64 to the Colorado Constitution, which passed November 6, 2012, legalized recreational marijuana use under State law. In 2006 Amendment 44 was rejected by 59 percent of the voting population. Amendment 44 would have legalized possession of 28. 45 grams (approximately one ounce) or less by adults 21 or older. California is estimated to have saved a billion dollars in a t welve year period between 1976 and1988 as a result of decriminalizing marijuana. In 2003 the United States spent $12. billion on law enforcement and court costs; and $16. 9 billion in penitentiary costs, with Alaska spending as much as $25 to $30million per year enforcing marijuana prohibition laws. There is little proof that decriminalization of marijuana use leads to an increase in marijuana use. The cost of arresting and prosecuting marijuana offenders were lower instates where possession of marijuana in small amounts had been decriminalized. In places where marijuana possession is still a criminal offense and not decriminalized, there has been an increase in marijuana use.In countries where marijuana has been decriminalized there are lower rates of drug use when compared to countries where marijuana possession in small amounts is still a criminal offense punished by jail time. In 2006, marijuana was the top cash crop in 12 states, one of the top 3 cash crops in 30 states and one of the top 5 cash crops in 39 states. United States marijuana production is estimated at $35 billion annually. Some Health Benefits of Marijuana Use Should marijuana still be illegal in the United States based on its health effects, medicinal value and costs to the country?Some people suffering from afflictions have to break the law to relieve chronic pain. 1. For asthma and the common cough ââ¬â Marijuana is one of the best dilators of the bronchioles (The first passageways by which the air passes through the nose to the air sacs of the lungs). 2. For AIDS Wasting Syndrome and Eating Disorders ââ¬â Where ââ¬Å"munchiesâ⬠from smoking marijuana increases the userââ¬â¢s appetite. 3. For Crohnââ¬â¢s Disease, Cancer, and Migraines ââ¬â Marijuanaââ¬â¢s pain relieving qualities help. 4. For ADD and ADHD ââ¬â Besides being an alternative to Ritalin, marijuana helps without any of the Ritalin side effects. . Pre Menstrual Syndrome (PMS) ââ¬â Reduces pain in severe cases of PMS. 6. Touretteââ¬â¢s and OCD (Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder) ââ¬â Marijuana slows down the tics in people that have Touretteââ¬â¢s and the symptoms of the people with OCD. 7. For Anxiety-Marijuana calms 8. Hepatitis C-Marijuana helps improve drug therapy treatment 9. Marijuana also helps with Schizophrenia, Epilepsy, Depression, and Multiple Sclerosis. I tried to give as much information as I could to let you know whatââ¬â¢s going on. I hope I did that. Works Cited ââ¬Å"Decriminalization of Marijuanaâ⬠, Lawrence, B. K. Studymode. com, 6 May 2005, http://www. Studymode. com/Essays/Decriminalization-marijuana-56452. html ââ¬Å"Decriminalization of Marijuanaâ⬠, 123HelpMe. com, 10 Mar 2013 ââ¬Å"Decriminalization of Marijuanaâ⬠, Termpaper. com, 12 Apr 2012 http://Termpaper. com/Essay-on/Decriminalization-Of-Marijuana/79942 ââ¬Å"Decriminalization vs. Prohibitionâ⬠, 123HelpMe. com, 10 Mar 2013 http://www. 123HelpMe. com/view. as p? id=61687 ââ¬Å"Illegal Drugs: Legalization of Marijuanaâ⬠, Marijuana. com, 19 Apr 2010 ââ¬Å"Smoke In The Airâ⬠, 123HelpMe. com, 10 Mar 2013 http://www. 123HelpMe. com/view. asp? id=86223
Tuesday, January 7, 2020
Scholar Critic - 1446 Words
F.W.BATESON, GONE WITH 1978! ââ¬Å"SCHOLAR ââ¬âCRITICâ⬠- ARCHAIC Submitted by, Annie Kantha.P , M.Phil English. Fredrick Wilse Bateson (1901 - 1978), an English literary scholar and critic, was born in Cheshire and educated at Chaterhouse and at Trinity College, Oxford. He is best remembered for his work of the post-war years. In 1951 he founded the critical journal Essays in Criticism and his other works include Words-Worth: Aâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦It is a system of norms of ideal concepts which are intersubjective. They must be assumed to exist in collective ideology, changing with it, accessible only through individual mental experiences, based on the sound - structure of its sentences. (54) Batesonââ¬â¢s criticism on Wellek seems partial, for he says the Sui generis is irrelevant and he says that the way in which the reality of a statue differs from that of other works of art is not clear. Batesonââ¬â¢s classification of literature is not fair in the age of deconstruction. The chapter ââ¬Å"Works of Referenceâ⬠is irrelevant in this age of information boom. Because of so many factors and the available facts, an observer is generally confused. The facts are too many that it is difficult to isolate them and we are also ill-equipped with tools to verify them. The past refers to definite and concrete information in the form of books, dictionaries, encyclopedia etc. But in the present reference material are constantly at a change. The present generation will not be able to follow Batesonââ¬â¢s ââ¬Å"Works of Referenceâ⬠because of variety of information in todayââ¬â¢s digital globalized era. The research is already made. The idea of reference is in itself an illusive component in the age of reference. What we have researched yesterday will not be available today. If this is the case, the researcher will not be able to complete his research. The idea of reference has changed a lot and so it isShow MoreRelatedMatthew Arnold as a Poet and C ritic1500 Words à |à 6 PagesAmal Mohaya AlRekabi Course : Poetry Matthew Arnold as a Poet and Critic The word criticism is derived from a Greek word that means judgment. So, criticism is basically the exercise of judgment, and literary criticism is, therefore, the exercise of judgment on works of literature. From this, it is clear that the nature of literary criticism is to examine a work of literature, and its function is to identify its points of excellence and its inadequacies, and finally to evaluate itsRead MoreEssay Humor and Criticism in Erasmuss Praise of Folly1293 Words à |à 6 Pagesfor scorn. This section finds great ironic humor in the folly of all types of conceit, pointing out that the most condescending of people have little reason for such egotism. Folly laughs at the conceit of ââ¬Å"the general run of gentry and scholarsâ⬠with their ââ¬Å"distorted sense of modestyâ⬠(11) including ââ¬Å"those who lay special claim to be called the personification of wisdom, even though they strut about ââ¬Ëlike apes in purpleââ¬â¢ and ââ¬Ëasses in lion-skinsââ¬â¢Ã¢â¬ (13). Folly, of course, is guilty of thisRead MoreWhich Art Historical Method I Would Use: The Ideas of Erwin Panofsky and Adrian Piper1175 Words à |à 5 Pageshe states that [Panofsky] makes clear his acceptance of the need to test theories and objects against the political and social tendencies of a personality, period or country, but he seldom does so. and then goes on to call Panofsky an armchair scholar. In The Politics of Iconology, Keith Moxey argues that The politics of iconology is to claim that it has no politics and In order that our discipline can enter a fruitful dialogue with the discourses that currently animate other fields in the humanitiesRead MoreArt Conservation and Restoration1198 Words à |à 5 Pagesdamage and numerous repairs. From 1978 to 1999, a major restoration project was done, and the painting was eventually, after twenty-one years, returned to display. However, major changes in ââ¬Å"colors, tones, and some facial shapesâ⬠were noted by the critics. Dr. James Beck, an art history professor at Columbia University and founder of Art Watch, claimed that only ââ¬Å"18-20% of the painting was actually done by Leonardoââ¬â¢s hand. The rest is the product of the restorersâ⬠. Clearly, the piece is not in itsRead MoreIn Finance, Scholars Are Led By The Matter They Want To1076 Words à |à 5 PagesIn Finance, scholars are led by the matter they want to study and define the approaches and the methods to use according to the environment and the subject of the study. During this essay, we will describe how scholars in finance approach problems and topics, then we will explore the methods they use before examining how they ensure the quality and the publication of the result of their research. The goal of research in the science of finance is to improve the financial environment and the financialRead MoreThe Battle Of The Books Essay1464 Words à |à 6 Pagesbetween two groups propagating two entirely separate concepts of knowledge and literature. The tone of this piece is argumentative; it takes on the role of a satirical discourse and argues the case of the Ancients as being superior in this battle. Two critics of Swiftââ¬â¢s working of The Battle of the Books are Steele and Addison, writers of The Spectator. In their piece entitled His chief Satires: A Tale of a Tub; The Battle of the Books; Gulliverââ¬â¢s Travels, Addison and Steele write that A Tale of a TubRead MoreReligious Conflict Of Dante s Inferno1570 Words à |à 7 PagesJessica Gay World Literature Dr. Schott 9 November 2014 Religious Conflict in Danteââ¬â¢s Inferno Critics Daniel Tompsett and Donald Winchester and literary scholar Nicole Rudick have argued that Danteââ¬â¢s Inferno is a dark and hopeless telling of how we are all relegated to sin and lack the will or righteousness to turn from sin and temptation. Tompsett and Winchester state that, ââ¬Å"The placement of living figures in each section was a judgment and a condemnation, albeit subjective, on both history andRead MoreBirth Order Effect On Child Development1070 Words à |à 5 Pagesmiddle child is lazy, neglected, and has a low self-esteem, is a legitimate phenomenon. It is also commonly assumed that the oldest child is confident and ambitious while the youngest is spoiled and less intelligent that the other siblings. Scholars and critics debate the influence of birth order on childrenââ¬â¢s temperaments, intellectual capabilities, and social development. Personality, oneââ¬â¢s individual characteristics, are determined by a variety of factors. Birth order may be a confounding factorRead MoreReading the Old Testament Essay1187 Words à |à 5 PagesThe Old Testament and the Bible itself has been studied extensively for centuries. Archeologists and Scholars have labored and pondered over texts trying to decipher its clues. It does not matter how many times the Old Testament has been studied there will always be something new to learn about it or the history surrounding it. In the book Reading the Old Testament: an Introduction, the author Lawrence Boadt presents us with a few different authors of the Old Testament that used different names forRead MoreCritical Analysis of Romanticism1387 Words à |à 6 PagesThis literature review will critically analyse a range of arguments and perspectives by literary critics and historians and their views will be pertinent to the study of Romanticism . Due to the scale of research in Ro mantic literature as a discipline, the main focus in this paper will concentrate primarily on two major paradigms in Romantic literature. These two aspects are referred to as Romantic nature and Romantic sublime. The paper will be organised and divided into two
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)